BUILDING OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE THROUGH INVENTORY INTELLIGENCE
A global food and consumer goods manufacturer strengthens operational resilience by institutionalizing spare parts criticality, demand forecasting, and AI-driven inventory optimization.
About the Client
Founded in 1911, this American multinational company is a leading manufacturer of confectionery, pet food, and food ingredients, as well as a provider of animal care services.
Headquartered in McLean, Virginia, the company operates more than 130 manufacturing facilities across 75 countries and employs over 100,000 associates worldwide. Annual global revenues exceed $35 billion.
Industry: Food and Beverages
Operational Scope: Global MRO Inventory and Spare Parts Management
Manufacturing Footprint: 130+ facilities
Regions: North America and Latin America, Europe and CIS, Asia Pacific, Middle East and Africa
Systems Landscape: 5 SAP instances and Microsoft Navision
Spare Parts Volume: 1M+ MRO SKUs
Key Facts
100K+
Associates
130+
Factories
75
Countries
$35B+
Annual Revenue
The organization operated with a transactional MRO system that supported procurement and inventory recording, but lacked advanced intelligence for forecasting, criticality assessment, and lifecycle optimization.
The Background
Over decades of growth and acquisitions, each manufacturing site developed its own approach to managing spare parts.
Defensive Inventory Strategies
Inventory strategies were largely defensive. Plants carried excess stock to reduce downtime risk. However, production disruptions still occurred when critical parts were unavailable.
Inconsistent Criticality Classifications
Criticality classifications were inconsistent across sites. Forecasting relied heavily on historical averages. Reorder points were manually defined and rarely recalibrated.
Underutilized Work Order Data
Work order data was stored but not fully leveraged to improve spare planning. Obsolete and slow-moving parts accumulated in storerooms, increasing carrying costs and tying up working capital.
The organization recognized the need to move from reactive inventory buffering to structured, intelligence-driven spare parts management.
The Challenge
The company faced a structural inventory imbalance across its global operations.
Excess Inventory
High safety stock levels were maintained to compensate for uncertainty. This increased carrying costs and warehouse complexity.
Inaccurate Spare Parts Criticality
Criticality assessments were often limited to basic ABC or VED classifications. These models did not incorporate failure history, production impact, maintenance frequency, or downtime cost.
Unpredictable Demand
Forecasting models did not differentiate between planned maintenance demand and unexpected failure-driven consumption. Demand variability was poorly understood.
Inefficient Reorder Logic
Reorder points and reorder quantities were static. They did not reflect changing consumption patterns, lead time variability, or equipment lifecycle stages.
Obsolescence Accumulation
Slow-moving and non-moving inventory continued to grow, particularly for legacy or retired equipment.
Limited Multi-Site Coordination
Spare parts were often duplicated across plants without visibility into cross-plant availability.
Reactive Procurement
Emergency purchases were common when high-risk parts failed unexpectedly.
The organization needed to institutionalize criticality assessment, forecasting, and inventory optimization across its global footprint.
Key Business Objectives
Institutionalize AI-driven spare parts criticality scoring
Improve forecast accuracy for both planned and unplanned demand
Optimize reorder points, reorder quantities, and safety stock levels
Reduce stockout-driven production disruptions
Identify and manage obsolete and slow-moving inventory
Enable multi-site demand coordination
Reduce inventory carrying costs without increasing operational risk
The Solution
Enterprise-Grade Spare Parts Inventory Intelligence Framework
To address structural inventory imbalance and operational risk exposure, the organization deployed an AI-native Spare Parts Inventory Intelligence framework embedded within its existing SAP and Navision environments. The objective was to institutionalize risk-based inventory decision-making across 130+ manufacturing facilities.
The framework was built across six operational pillars.
Replacing static criticality scoring methods with multi-dimensional scoring
AI forecasting for planned and unplanned MRO demand
Service-level-driven inventory recalibration
Maintenance data as a predictive input
Structured disposition of aging inventory
Network-wide visibility and procurement intelligence
The Solution
Enterprise-Grade Spare Parts Inventory Intelligence Framework
Pillar 1: Risk-Based Spare Parts Criticality Engineering
Traditional ABC/VED models were replaced with a multi-dimensional criticality framework grounded in reliability engineering.
Criticality Scoring Inputs
  • FMEA logic and Risk Priority Number
  • MTBF and MTTR metrics
  • Line dependency and throughput impact
  • Food safety and compliance exposure
  • Lead time volatility and supplier risk
  • Multi-site shared asset dependencies
Outcome
Criticality scores were dynamic, recalibrated using live work order history, breakdown trends, and equipment reliability signals — creating a standardized, enterprise-wide criticality architecture.
Pillar 2: Advanced Demand Signal Modeling
MRO demand in FMCG environments is inherently irregular — influenced by maintenance cycles, unplanned breakdowns, seasonal peaks, and equipment aging.
Model Inputs
  • Historical consumption at plant and line level
  • PM schedules and shutdown calendars
  • Asset age curves and failure rate progression
  • Campaign-based production cycles
  • Seasonality patterns
Outcome
Autonomous model selection differentiated high-consumption consumables from low-frequency critical spares. Forecast accuracy exceeded 95% for maintenance-intensive assets including fillers, wrappers, conveyors, and mixing systems.
Pillar 3: Service-Level Driven Reorder & Safety Stock Optimization
Reorder points and quantities were recalibrated using a probabilistic, service-level-based framework.
Optimization Inputs
  • Demand variability and criticality score
  • Target service level by asset class
  • Vendor lead time distribution
  • Supply chain risk index
  • Inter-plant transfer feasibility
Outcome
Production-critical spares received higher service levels. Low-impact auxiliary equipment was rationalized. Min-Max levels were automated with periodic scenario simulations — rebalancing working capital without compromising reliability KPIs.
The Solution
Pillar 4: Work Order–Integrated Material Planning
Work order history was operationalized as a predictive input rather than archived data.
Analysis Inputs
  • Failure recurrence frequency
  • Component replacement cycles
  • Asset-level consumption patterns
  • Maintenance backlog indicators
  • Corrective vs. preventive maintenance ratios
Outcome
Cross-plant coordination enabled visibility into surplus stock across facilities. For FMCG networks with regional hubs, this reduced duplicate stocking and improved network-level inventory leverage. Maintenance and procurement teams operated from a shared material risk dashboard.
Pillar 5: Obsolescence and Inventory Aging Management
FMCG plants frequently upgrade lines, creating spare parts tied to decommissioned or modified equipment.
AI Identification
  • Non-moving inventory beyond thresholds
  • Parts associated with retired assets
  • Low-probability demand with high holding cost
  • Excess quantities vs. forecasted consumption
Disposition Actions
  • Inter-plant redistribution
  • Vendor return evaluation
  • Gradual run-down strategies
  • Capital write-off planning
This replaced reactive clean-up exercises with a structured approach to inventory aging.
Pillar 6: Multi-Site Inventory Coordination and Procurement Intelligence
The platform enabled network-wide visibility across five SAP instances and Navision.
Capabilities
  • Multi-site demand aggregation
  • Vendor lead time intelligence
  • Automated procurement recommendations
  • Exception-based stockout alerts
  • Cross-plant inventory rebalancing
Outcome
Procurement decisions were aligned with asset criticality and demand risk. Human-in-the-loop validation was applied for high-value and high-impact parts to ensure operational confidence.
Value Drivers
1
Working Capital Release Without Increasing Downtime Risk
10–15% reduction in overall MRO inventory carrying cost. 12–18% reduction in slow-moving and non-moving stock. Multi-million dollar working capital unlocked across high-value spare categories. Inventory reduction was achieved through risk-calibrated stocking logic rather than blanket cost cutting, preserving service levels for production-critical assets.
2
Improved Availability of Critical Spares
20% improvement in service levels for high-criticality parts. Significant reduction in stockout-driven production disruptions. Reduced reliance on emergency procurement and premium freight. Risk-based criticality scoring ensured that throughput-critical components for high-speed lines were consistently protected.
3
95%+ Forecast Accuracy in Key MRO Categories
95%+ forecast accuracy for high-consumption maintenance categories. 30–40% improvement in predictability of breakdown-driven demand. Separation of planned and unplanned demand significantly reduced demand distortion and improved procurement stability.
4
Reorder Point and Safety Stock Optimization
15–25% recalibration of Min-Max levels across plants. 10–18% reduction in excess safety stock without compromising service levels. Service-level-driven stocking logic improved capital efficiency while maintaining production reliability.
5
Enterprise-Wide Criticality Standardization
100% institutionalized risk-based criticality scoring across 1M+ SKUs. 25–40% reclassification of parts previously misaligned under static ABC or VED models. This created a consistent enterprise-wide framework for prioritizing inventory investment.

Overall Enterprise Impact
Across similar large-scale FMCG deployments, AI-led spare parts lifecycle optimization has unlocked over $45 million in combined savings through:
  • Working capital optimization
  • Downtime avoidance
  • Procurement efficiency
  • Inventory rationalization
Operational Impact
The organization transitioned from defensive overstocking to structured, risk-calibrated inventory planning.
Improved Spare Availability
High-criticality spares achieved improved availability without blanket inventory inflation.
Reduced Emergency Procurement
Emergency procurement reduced across major plants.
Obsolescence Decline
Slow-moving and obsolete stock exposure declined.
Shared Risk Visibility
Maintenance and procurement teams operated with shared risk visibility.
Aligned Investment Decisions
Inventory investment decisions were aligned with throughput protection, food safety compliance, and service-level commitments.

Across comparable enterprise FMCG deployments, this framework contributed to more than $45 million in combined savings through working capital release, downtime avoidance, and procurement optimization.
Discover How Verdantis Can Transform Your Data
Get In Touch
Location:
103 Carnegie Center, Suite 300, Princeton, NJ 08540
Telephone:
+1 (866) 987-4463 (USA)